2.17 The double slit experiment misinterpretation and the issue with particle accelerators (no paywall)
New Age Physics — The New Physics of the Future (16 of 19)
2.17 The double slit experiment misinterpretation and the issue with particle accelerators
The double slit experiment, which is at the base of the entire Quantum Mechanics, has been misinterpreted. It is said that one electron being ejected in front of two little openings, will sometimes interfere with itself, and create a wave pattern on the screen behind the openings, instead of dots as it should be, if they were to pass through only one slit. This is said to be a proof that the electron is going through both openings at the same time, proving the wave-particle duality of matter. Moreover, it is said that whether we observe the experiment, or don’t, will alter the results.
For Mark McCutcheon, the author of The Final Theory and Atomic Expansion Theory, it is simple. When they say that only one electron is being ejected at a time, before passing through one slit or the other, or through both slits at the same time, he says that in fact there are more than one electron being ejected, but our measuring instruments cannot detect them. Hence, they still have the interfering pattern of waves on the screen behind the slits. And of course, maybe a whole bunch of neutrinos are also ejected with each electron.
According to Mark McCutcheon, it would prove almost unthinkable that we would be able to fire off just one electron or one cluster of electrons (photon) at a time. In his debunk of Quantum Mechanics, McCutcheon shows that energy or light does not have a dual nature of wave and particles. Instead, it is always a sea of particles that move in waves. Just like molecules of gases will move in waves of air, and water molecules will move in waves of water. Waves of energy cannot cancel each other out, it would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. Instead, simply all the particles stop moving in waves and scatter in all directions.
As to the results being different depending on if we are observing the experiment or not, if the act of observing requires any kind of particles being thrown at the experiment, such as light, which are clusters of electrons, or beams of electrons, then of course it would affect the electrons or clusters being fired within the experiment. Not observing the experiment will result in less particles going around in there, observing it might flood the whole experiment with particles, altering the results.
This is also a problem in particle accelerators. If you are using electricity or electromagnetic fields to accelerate the particles in an accelerator, then you are essentially firing clouds of electrons to speed up the particles. Their expansion rate is set, the speed at which they are launched freely into space will never push them ever faster. It does not mean that the mass of the particles is becoming infinite, as Einstein’s relativity states, and that they can no longer go over the speed of light. The experiment is simply limited by the speed of the particles they use in order to accelerate them.
And of course, if all particles are made of electrons, and you are constantly throwing electrons at them, bits will break up, others will stick and create what seems like new particles that will only exist for a micro-second. However, these are not new particles, you can easily create an infinite number of particles if you wish, all of them with a slightly different number of electrons. Only stable particles in nature are worthwhile and should be considered particles.
You will note that beyond neutrinos, electrons, clusters of electrons, protons, neutrons and atoms, neither Mark McCutcheon nor I mention any other particle. McCutcheon does not even mention the neutrinos. And even then, for me the protons and neutrons at the larger scale, are now more like shapeless groupings of solar systems, linked together by orbiting planets between them, which overall correspond to a certain energetic value equivalent to a proton or a neutron at the smaller scale.
This must reflect what protons and neutrons look like in the very small. Maybe they have a shape, maybe they are balls. We would need to map accurately a few solar systems in our galaxy, not using redshifts in light, and check which ones are linked together through orbiting planets, and identify what shape these groupings might have.
Table of content (no paywall)
2.1 New Age Physics Short Summary, a Theory of Everything
2.2 New Age Physics Long Summary (the remainder of chapter 2)
2.3 The constant expansion of all atoms is gravity
2.4 Everything is just expansion and contraction of orbiting and vibrating matter
2.6 What are other dimensions and planes of existence?
2.7 How to move to other dimensions?
2.8 How to raise the vibrational rate or interdimensional frequency of matter?
2.9 How can UFOs fly so easily and how to build an anti-gravity device?
2.11 Gravity — No speed of light limit, the speed of light is relative and variable even in a vacuum
2.11a Atomic and Subatomic Expansion Equation to calculate gravity between expanding objects made of atoms and/or electrons
2.12a Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
2.12b Coulomb’s Law
2.13 A different concept of positively and negatively charged particles in Atomic Expansion Theory
2.14 Interdimensional time is relative — Time is not relative nor a dimension as Einstein claimed
2.15 E=mc² should be replaced by the kinetic energy equation Eₖ=½mv² (short version)
2.16 Redshifts misinterpretation — No dark matter, dark energy, Big Bang or black holes
2.17 The double slit experiment misinterpretation and the issue with particle accelerators
2.18 Quantum Entanglement misinterpretation
2.19 Parallel universes — The Heisenberg uncertainty principle misinterpretation
2.20 Five types of expansion and contraction of matter to explain the entire physics (short version)
Download New Age Physics Free Chapters:
Book PDF, Docx PDF, DOCX, Kindle ePub, Kindle Mobi, Apple Books, Nook, Google Play, Kobo, Generic ePub
